"christians" vs who?
Here I am stepping onto a soapbox. Ahem....
There's a new movie coming out called "Amazing Grace". Its the true story of how a former British slave trader fought to end slavery. It was the impact of his faith in God and the convictions that stemmed from it that led him to reject his slave trading past. Part of that change involved him writing the song we now know as Amazing Grace. Its a powerful story of how one man's change of heart changed the world we live in.
Here's what irks me so much - the advertising. On the radio they have the usual comments by movie critics about how great the movie is. Then comes the quote from Chuck Colson, a prominent leader among American evangelicals. "This is a movie every Christian must see." WHY ONLY CHRISTIANS? Its a historical movie. Its something that is pertinent to the world we live in. So is he saying that because it is also a story about faith that its not a movie for everyone? It pisses me off to see prominent church leaders creating such dividing lines. Really, if its good enough for your church members to see is it going to kill anyone else to see the movie? Why not say that its a movie everyone should see? But no, apparently in Colson's eyes, and the advertising execs, its better to cater to a group that they see as more imortant or better than everyone else. That is a freakng tragedy. From the top down evangelicals in America have created an us verses them mentality and they refuse to see the damage they've caused. Yet another reason why I'm embarrased by the implications of being called a Christian in today's culture.
Note: I need to clarify something thanks to the observation of a friend. This blog represents my initial reaction to the radio ad. Frankly my reaction stems from a sometimes unhealthy cynicism I feel toward my own religious background. I do not believe that my statements above were necessarily the intent of the advertisers. It is simply a reflection of how the ad came across to me.

